Identity: Annotated in the Margins – Day 50

Prompt – Outgrowing an identity.

I wrote the paper I mentioned in my previous post before I knew I was actually beginning to draw a map. Back then I thought I was explaining two people, Rodney and Lj, like they were characters in a story. One careful. One loud. One polite enough to be invited to dinner. One reckless enough to laugh at the invitation. I thought I was making sense of opposites. I did not realize I was documenting my survival up to that point.

Rodney was the name that arrived first. It came with expectations and rules and the quiet understanding that good children did not take up too much space. Rodney knew how to observe, how to blend, how to make himself acceptable in rooms that did not always feel safe. Rodney watched more than he spoke. Rodney carried the weight of being seen as good because being good felt like protection.

Lj came later, but he felt older somehow. He showed up in locker rooms and late conversations and moments when the rules stopped making sense. Lj said what Rodney swallowed. Lj used language like a blade and a bridge at the same time. He did not wait for permission. He did not soften edges just to make others comfortable. Back then I called him the “bad” extreme. Now I think he was just more authentic and honest.

Reading that old paper now feels like opening a time capsule written by someone who knew more than he admitted. I can hear the younger version of me trying to organize identity into categories; good versus bad, reckless versus respectable, loud versus quiet. He needed the world to be that simple because he had not yet learned that both voices were trying to keep him alive.

The truth is that Rodney and Lj were never enemies. They were translators for each other. Rodney understood the cost of words; Lj understood the cost of silence. Rodney held the map; Lj lit the match. Somewhere between the two, a writer started to form.

I think about how often I moved as a kid, how every new base felt like an invitation to reinvent myself. Identity was never fixed; it was something I packed in a suitcase and tried on again when the walls changed. That paper captured the moment when I first noticed that reinvention had a pattern. I did not become someone new; I just shifted which part of me was allowed to speak.

There is something tender about the younger voice calling Lj loved or hated but never ignored. I hear a kid trying to make sense of visibility after years of practicing invisibility. He did not yet know that being seen would come with its own kind of grief, that every word spoken out loud would echo longer than expected.

What surprises me most is not how different I sound now, but how familiar that voice feels. The metaphors were already there. The obsession with language was already there. Even the quiet awareness that identity was not a single story but a conversation between versions of myself had already begun.

Maybe this happen when returning to old pages; not to correct them, but to recognize the person who was brave enough to start writing before he knew where the story was going.

Rodney is still here. He always will be. He is the part of me that pauses before speaking, the part that listens for the unsaid. Lj is still here too, louder now, less interested in apologizing for taking up space. They no longer feel like extremes. They feel like witnesses to each other.

If I could speak to the kid who turned that paper in, the one who received a modest grade and moved on, I would tell him this: you were not describing two personalities. You were describing the beginning of a voice that would take decades to understand itself.

And maybe that is the real battle. Not outgrowing Rodney or Lj or any other identity, but learning how to let them all sit at the same table without one trying to replace the others. But seriously, a C-? WTF!

Exit Through the Gift Shop – Day 13

Prompt – What did conflict look like in your home?

In the museum that was my family, exhibits were arranged with great care, but no one ever explained how to walk through the space and appreciate it. There were rules, but they were invisible. There were expectations, but they were never spoken aloud. Reverence was required, though no one ever showed what reverence looked like. Conflict rose and settled, mostly silent, like high blood pressure. It was present and deadly.

I was expected to know how to move, how to speak, how to respond, without ever being taught. Love was supposed to be understood. Respect was supposed to be automatic. No questions. If something felt off, it was never the environment. It was me. If someone felt unseen, it became my responsibility to fix it, even when I did not know what was broken.

There was very little modeling and no learning together. There was quiet judgment when the performance did not match the script that existed inside someone else’s imagination. So I studied faces and read spaces the way visitors study paintings. I read silence the way curators study cracks in marble. I anticipated needs that were never spoken. Over time, I confused vigilance with care. I confused fear with respect. I confused self-erasure with love.

Having my own family, I know that healthy families teach. They model love for each other. They meet you where you are. They invite you into the room instead of scolding you for not knowing the path. They offer maps. They offer language. They practice connection in the open, not behind glass. They make mistakes out loud. They apologize out loud. They are noisy. They are alive.

I am still unlearning the rules of the gallery. I am still learning that I do not have to bow to every display or stop at every exhibit. I am allowed to ask questions. I am allowed to exist in the room without shrinking to fit someone else’s idea of beauty. I am allowed to walk past what harms me. Little by little, I choose different architecture for my own family. There are far fewer exhibits and a hell of a lot more living. I teach my children that conflict is not something to fear. It is something we move through together. I make space for mistakes. I say what I feel and let them say what they feel. We practice beginning again. We learn in the open.

Sometimes the old museum haunts me with its polished floors and quiet shame. Sometimes I still find myself whispering in rooms that no longer require my silence. But I notice it now. I pause and I breathe. I set down the old way.

As an adult, I am beginning to believe something I could not have imagined as a child: love is not earned through performance. Love is not proven through suffering. Love grows in rooms where people are allowed to exist as they are.

The museum will always be part of my story, but I am learning how to walk out of the gallery without carrying the blame as a souvenir.

February 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728